Natureza jurídica e eficácia da sentença civil: perspectiva da incidência normativa

Abstract

This work is proposing a dogmatic scientific-research of the legal nature and of the efficaciousness of judicial decision from the point of view of normative effect, giving them semiotic approach, by a vision of the theory of codes and meaning; linguistic concepts were inevitable to the understanding about the logical-formal that requires a content inseparable for any formalization and the thought in itself is already under the rules and patterns of the language in which the objects are known, leading to, for any logic that stands out as legal, a validation not only a priori, but also a posteriori. The Theory of Legal Fact was revisited to the insert of a new feature to the plan of the efficaciousness and thereby to demonstrate the relation of unlimited causality between legal fact and efficaciousness, applying to them and as well as to the effect the Theory of Sets. It has been introduced the concept of ideal fact support as a requeriment to interpret the legal phenomenon from the material fact to the legal norm. The expression of the hypothetical imperative of Kelsen, revised by Carlos Cossio, was formed by a paraconsistent and axiological modal, in which the legal phenomenon is seen, so, extensional-intencional. After the demonstration of such assumptions, it got concluded that the existence of judicial decision as soon produces a set efficaciousness, which neither the appeal for a formal reconsideration of judgement can affect it, reaching only the decision s effects. The legal nature of judicial decision was designed taking into account its components both constitutional and of act strictly of law. The constitution of the legal fact by procedural law was only put on the plan's validity and efficaciousness