Incidente de resolução de demandas repetitivas : perspectivas econômicas implícitas na resolução de demandas repetitivas e de massa no projeto do novo código de processo civil

Abstract

This dissertation is dedicated to the study of the consequences from the application of the incident resolution in repetitive demands proposed in the project of the new Code of Civil Procedure, under the viewpoint of reciprocal interference between economy and law. It is analyzed the possibility of normative and procedural changes may bring unintended consequences to the procedure speed and to the ideal of justice. The research deals with procedural techniques previewed on Brazilian law and foreign law for collective treatment of repetitive questions related to the individual demands. It is highlighted the advantages and disadvantages of collective actions themselves, in which it was verified the phenomenon of extraordinary legitimation. It is also analyzed the economic viewpoint of the incident from repetitive demands resolution, proposed in the project of the New Code of Civil Procedure, comparing it to the collective processes, among which stands out the causes-pilot system and the group actions, both on Foreign Law as the on the Homeland Law. Listed and described these procedural techniques, it is looked to contextualize its emergence in the current scenario of the Brazilian legal system, mainly in light of the right of contradictory as a factor participation stakeholder in building the jurisdictional decision and the adversarial right on the civil process, critical notes were made to the legal text that provides such procedures in the light of these principles. It was used to approach the subject as much the deductive method as the dialectical, and, as to make the historical method, the comparative, descriptive and exploratory. The survey was developed by the theoretical argumentation, literature review of national and foreign.