Egressos de um hospital psiquiátrico e sua reinserção na comunidade: perspectivas psicológicas e religiosidades.

Abstract

Patients suffer from the lack of preparation for life outside the psychiatric hospital, because the care and protectionist practices of the old hospital-centered model are reinforced. Many of these egresses are not even able to use the card to withdraw their benefit, the most common rights, rights to information and communication being usurped. Often with considerable cognitive perception of the world, which reinforces the stigmatization of "madness" and "egresses”. How can religiosity contribute to the process of psychosocial reintegration in the community, in the process of psychological and social integration, even with serious problems in its scope? The objective is to identify and reflect on the practices and projects of promoting the mental health team of Hospital Psiquiátrico Ulysses Pernambucano (HUP) in the psychosocial reintegration of egresses into the community, according to the assumptions of the Psychiatric Reform (Law 10.216 \ 2001), and on the religiosity of these patients during the process of readaptation to the community of origin. We worked with bibliographic research and searches on YouTube images and videos. It was found that the HUP develops several therapeutic projects in CAT, with recreational and therapeutic purposes, none of which consists of the educational and professional training of its patients, of continuity of studies, which reveals the institutional disbelief in the capacity for intellectual rehabilitation of its patients and lack of concern with the psychosocial reinsertion of its public, in a society that proves to be increasingly exclusionary. It was noticed the presence of faithful from different religious backgrounds in the space of Hospital Ulysses Pernambucano, where religiosity has already been viewed with suspicion, under hygienist standards. It discusses the importance of the psychologist, with the multidisciplinary team, to consider (being open without prejudice) to the individual's religious discourse, identifying symbologies, religious conflicts, institutional beliefs, pathologies of a religious order and the inclusive practices of religions that promote autonomy, resilience and empathy in order to facilitate the process of psychosocial reintegration of its egresses.